

|
Valid XHTML v1.0
Author Profile
Top Authors
Log In to set widget preferences
| Author | # |
|---|---|
|
185 |
|
148 |
Anonymous User
|
49 |
|
28 |
Kimberly Hieber
|
27 |
|
23 |
Note: some conversations may be proxied or secured, thereby causing # differences
Subscribe
Partners
Recent
Tags
Log In to set widget preferences
Recent
Log In to set widget preferences
Most Active
Log In to set widget preferences
Popular
Log In to set widget preferences
|
|
Ruby On Rails Six Month Technical Evaluation
by Brittain on 2006-12-13 06:45 PM read 1669 times |
Back in August I wrote a piece enumerating our opinions about working with Ruby on Rails. As promised therein, here's our 6 month followup.
A small bit of context first. We currently serve a couple paying customers (monthly usage fees) and have another handful of live pilots and/or sites running our products. We base our assessment on serving those customers.
In no particular order:
Moreover, there is no discernible relationship between these tools and Rails itself, so there doesn't appear to be a near term future where they interact better (e.g. a lightweight Rails implementation that provides ActiveRecord support without the additional footprint).
Furthermore, we don't find any significant benefit in the substantial focus on RESTful Rails. There ultimately be a decline in the labor to create RESTful Rails apps, but there's no customer benefit, so little interest from us.
So that's pretty much it. Thoughts? Comments and disagreement welcome!
Log In to Reply |
Log In to Copy |
Tell a Friend
|
Trackback URL: http://www.kalivo.com/trackback/370-ruby-on-rails-six-month-technical-evaluation
