|
Valid XHTML v1.0
Author Profile
Top Authors
Log In to set widget preferences
| Author | # |
|---|---|
|
185 |
|
|
148 |
Anonymous User
|
49 |
|
28 |
|
Kimberly Hieber
|
27 |
|
23 |
Note: some conversations may be proxied or secured, thereby causing # differences
Subscribe
Partners
Recent
Tags
Log In to set widget preferences
Recent
Log In to set widget preferences
Most Active
Log In to set widget preferences
Popular
Log In to set widget preferences
|
|
re: re: re: Removal of referral validation
 a reply to re: re: Removal of referral validation in a conversation thread started hereby Brittain on 2008-08-05 07:52 PM read 64 times |
My statement was that we wouldn't need an integration test. As you said (and I agree with) the functionals should've detected the breakage. Certainly an integration test suite (independent of the functionals/units) and an environment to execute it in is a good thing.
As for your point, shouldn't the service_storage_client have its own tests (particularly mocking the service)? As the distributors of this proxy, I'd expect that whomever updated the API would be responsible for updating any proxy for that API.
In practice this task is sometimes forgotten, but IMO that's a sign of a weak engineering effort (not knowing and covering ones dependencies).
No current tags
Log In to Reply | Log In to Copy | Tell a Friend |
Trackback URL: http://www.kalivo.com/trackback/1561-re-re-re-removal-of-referral-validation
